TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI versus ORGANIZATION OF KARACHI PORT TRUST WORKERS
Sections 25 and 61 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O II, R 2 Golden Handshake Scheme Employer Demand Charter Employer Settlement, Acquisition and Exemption Interpretation, Disclaimer Rule of Claims in the Spot F Port Trust ( Appellant introduced an early retirement / Golden Handshake scheme (scheme) for its employees (defendants), however a dispute arose over a clause of the scheme, which stated that the calculation was made on the basis of change. Will go One of the last charters of employees' demands was that the last Charter of Demands demanded a 100% increase in salaries from 2004 to 2004, so in the case of the scheme, their salaries had to be calculated at 100. After the increase, the Port Trust's dispute was that the Charter of Demands did not exist until the date of 2004, when the underwriting scheme was announced. The fact is that the Charter of Demands 1, 2002, was implemented at the time of the scheme, and it was stated that the Employers' Charter of Demands Union demanded a 100% increase in salaries, but the settlement later rejected the demand. Done. 16% and said that the Charter of Demands merged into the township, therefore, employees benefiting from the scheme could seek compensation only due to the 16% increase, the High Court allowed constitutional application filed by employees and the Port Trust employs employees. Instructed to calculate the return of By allowing a 100% increase in the Charter of Demand for Requirements 1 4 2004, which was neither consistent nor offered by the Legal Charter of Demands 1 4 2004. Was launched when this project
