Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus THE STATE

Section 11/19 (2) Despite knowing that the case for appreciation of evidence was kept with the mother for 3/1 2 months, the complaining party's factum negatively affected the prosecution's evidence and identified the incident. The reason for this did not happen. After the prosecution's unlawful delay, the statements of the prosecution witnesses were recorded and they are of great interest, their testimony did not inspire confidence. The fact that the prosecution witnesses falsely implicated the accused. There was no reason why he had not made an inadvertent statement about the kidnapper. Section 6464, was not recorded in accordance with the law of CRP, when its recovery was not examined and no evidence of forced sexual abuse was made, the accused's acquittal of the accompanying accused Status and doubt was taken advantage of. Bad in the situation famous lower court advocate from Sehar Baqlas lawyer