Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AMIR MALIK versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH


Articles 133, 134 and 137 of Pakistan's Criminal Code (CCPC) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, a conditional order for the abolition of malice, was allegedly barred by the magistrate for filing an objection against such order. The sanction was granted against the applicant for removal of the magistrate. It was required under section 137, CCPC to conduct an inquiry through the recording of the evidence, but they passed the final order without having to make an inquiry order through a magistrate under section 133, CRPC seeking evidence in this case. Subsequent to the Tender Section 137 provided that there was no evidence to be recorded by the magistrate before passing the CCPC final order, the High Court had set aside the impugned order and strict the relevant law. After receiving the remand, a remand for the case was obtained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Swat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.