Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMIR MALIK versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH


Articles 133, 134 and 137 of Pakistan's Criminal Code (CCPC) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, a conditional order for the abolition of malice, was allegedly barred by the magistrate for filing an objection against such order. The sanction was granted against the applicant for removal of the magistrate. It was required under section 137, CCPC to conduct an inquiry through the recording of the evidence, but they passed the final order without having to make an inquiry order through a magistrate under section 133, CRPC seeking evidence in this case. Subsequent to the Tender Section 137 provided that there was no evidence to be recorded by the magistrate before passing the CCPC final order, the High Court had set aside the impugned order and strict the relevant law. After receiving the remand, a remand for the case was obtained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Kala Bagh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.