DHANI BUX versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 365 A & 395 Definition of Evidence Defendant's name was listed in the FIR, which abducted the complainant and demanded Rs.500,000 ransom from the prosecution witnesses for his release. ? The gold chains, Rs 500, the original documents of his motorcycle and the identity card have been identified by the complainant and the prosecution witness who demanded ransom for the release of the abductor. His conviction was retained by the defendant in the circumstances that the complainant had escaped from the clutches of the accused immediately after his abduction, which reduced the accused under Section 365 AA. There was a diminishing issue of punishment. The PPC was sentenced to life imprisonment accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Kasur lawyer
