Find a Lawyer

MUSHEER AHMED SIDDIQUI versus BADARUN NISSA

Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (vii), 16 (1) (2) and 18 Transfers of premises do not comply with a temporary rental order Defending tenant landlady after purchasing a house on dispute with the real owner Assault Notice was issued to the tenant, who received the notice of transfer of the property, who received the notice and replied to the notice regarding the rent of the landlord whereby the tenant would have to pay the arrears in the name of the landlord and He was instructed to submit future monthly rent, but the landlord refused to contact the landlord. Despite the notice of the transfer of the tenant and the landlord to the landlord between the parties, submitting the rent to the former owner of the premises instead of the landlord, who had previously accepted the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties. Could not be removed and said that the existence of the landlord and the tenant had begun to be notified under the existing legal tenancy section 18, Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979. When it was brought to the tenant by the tenant that it was reported that the property had changed, it was his responsibility to provide the rent to the landlord, even though the property was known to have changed, the name of the previous owner. The rent was to be submitted, it was not wrong to intend that the tenant's defense, under the circumstances, be struck down on non-compliance with the temporary rental order. immigration advocate from Rahimyar Khan lawyer