Find a Lawyer

JOHN CHIBUZO versus STATE

Testimony of the Customs Act 1969 Section 156 (1) (b) The recovery of 123 kilograms of heroin powder from the goods belonging to the accused cannot be excluded from the testimony of the prosecution witnesses against such recovery nor against such accused. There is no enmity of the witnesses. No material contradictions and contradictions were identified in the prosecution's evidence, the defendant's version also stated that nothing prohibited was safe from his possession, he could not be believed and the defendants in such large quantities. Heroin powder is unlikely to dissolve. All the prosecution's witnesses supported the recovery of heroin powder from the suspect's belongings. The Chemical Examiner's report proved to be a commercial-grade heroin, where the evidence of the prosecution was based on trust, no exceptions can be made to the trial trial. Point of recovery of heroin powder that the accused tried to smuggle out of Pakistan immigration advocates contact from Skardu lawyer