Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD KHAN versus CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government Act 1970 Section 25 D Azad Jammu and Kashmir Courts and Laws Code Act 1949, Section 35 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Protection of Execution Property Act, 1950, Section 11 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VII of 1974), Section 42 The decision of the Full Bench of the High Court of the High Court after considering various rules regarding the management of vacancies, especially with respect to the Baitmal Property Act 1948 and Azad Jammu and Kashmir Protection of Equity Property Act, 1950. After considering the facts of the case, it was found that when the appellant / plaintiff case was set up and settled, it was at the discretion of the sub-judge, who had already settled the case, Was specifically prohibited under Section 11, the judgment and decree passed by the Sub-Judge in connection with the vacancy in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Protection of Equity Property Act, 1950, which was declared illegal and illegal. The Full Bench of the High Court of the High Court has been given the provisions of Section 25D, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government Act, 1970 and Section 35, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Courts and Q&A. Noon code provided under the 1949 Act, the courts were given the option of monitoring and control over the courts. The findings were recorded by the High Court's Full Bench comprising the Chief Justice and two other High Court judges, who were in full force of the High Court at the time, saying that after exercising the jurisdiction of the Supervisor, the record was passed by the High Court. Phil Bench's searches were unimaginable and bound. All the executive and judicial authorities in Azad Jammu and Kashmir famous supreme court advocate from Shorkot lawyer