Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAMSUR REHMAN versus STATE


The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 392, 472, 411 and 171 of the case was presented to the complainant in full detail by the complainant, who had to rely on the complainant to be credible, even though he was acquitted. He was not the owner of the car, yet he could report the incident to the police, whose immediate, after-thought, question of counsel could not arise. The recovery of the vehicle from the accused at the time of his arrest proved that the accused. Confessed to the court, though he withdrew it. This was confirmed voluntarily and during the identification parade by the complainant and proof of the identity of the accused and the conviction of the accused was maintained under Sections 392 and 171, P.C.P.C. SS, 472 and under them were acquitted of the charges. 411, PPC,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Baroute lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.