SHAMSUR REHMAN versus STATE
The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 392, 472, 411 and 171 of the case was presented to the complainant in full detail by the complainant, who had to rely on the complainant to be credible, even though he was acquitted. He was not the owner of the car, yet he could report the incident to the police, whose immediate, after-thought, question of counsel could not arise. The recovery of the vehicle from the accused at the time of his arrest proved that the accused. Confessed to the court, though he withdrew it. This was confirmed voluntarily and during the identification parade by the complainant and proof of the identity of the accused and the conviction of the accused was maintained under Sections 392 and 171, P.C.P.C. SS, 472 and under them were acquitted of the charges. 411, PPC,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Baroute lawyer