Find a Lawyer

ZIA ULLAH versus STATE

Complainant of Section 17 (4) Explosive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (a) and 302 (b) of the evidence, immediately reported the incident, giving full details to the police, eye witnesses, No doubt, the casualties were related but such relationships alone could not make their testimony unbelievable, when their presence at the time of the incident was not open to any suspicion, firing distance and There was not much material contradiction in the evidence about the place alone that could adversely affect the prosecution's case. Medical evidence was prosecuted with the prosecution witnesses identified the accused in the identification parade as well as assigned an effective role in the recovery of the pistol from the accused in court and its use at the time of the incident proved to be a prosecution. Was. As such, beyond any reasonable doubt the trial court had brought the accused to the house, however, Tazkia al-Shudh's procedure did not and did not. Clarify how the court used the method of investigation to satisfy the witnesses' credibility, sentencing the accused to death under section 17 (4) of the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Jewish) Ordinance 1979 Given. a) In the circumstances, the PPC was converted to death as a trader under section 302 (b), PPC. law firms from Khyber Agency lawyer