MUHAMMAD KHALID versus STATER
The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) is charged with defining evidence __a the partner lives 20/30 kms away from the village of the victim and the victim was seen nearby. Because of this incident, there can be no question of his misidentification that the expert's nature is fully in harmony and to the extent that it is helpful to assist or facilitate the court in its decision. , The serologist's report may not override some pieces of evidence. The prosecution's two witnesses' testimony by the prosecution did not affect the merits of the case; ocular testimony was not disputed; the Victim girl very clearly and clearly attributed the blasphemous act of adultery. And other evidence contradicts the testimony of the injured in the medical evidence, and there was no sign of the ocular evidence. In the presence of direct evidence, the fiction did not cause a delay in filing an FIR in the circumstances of the trial, according to which the convicted defendant was retained with a substantial reduction in his convictions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mehar lawyer