ABDUL JALIL versus STATE
The defendants, complimented by the Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 section 9 (1) and 14 Penal Code (XLV of 1860) section 380, were so quick to admit that they did not know what they were He will know if the cash was stolen. An ingredient in the theft of excess of lineage was to attract the maximum punishment, so, according to the Sunnah of the Prophet, the marginalized sentence was prevented by the slightest doubt in favor of the accused. can go. The offense of theft by reason of non-limitation of the offense by the accused was against the offense under section 14 of the Property Enforcement (Ordinance) Ordinance, 1979, and a trial court under section 9 (1) of the said ordinance. The accused was convicted by. As a result, he was set aside and instead was convicted under Section 808080, PPC and sentenced to three years in prison with a RI fine.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Arifwala lawyer
