MUHAMMAD SARWAR KHAN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT BAGH versus MUHAMMAD NISAR KH4N, ACTING DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENTOF POLICE,POLICE TRAINING SCHOOL, MUZAFFARABAD
Determination of Police Seniority from Police Prosecution Branch of Section 4 Government Employee, Section 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Drafting Act of 1974 (XXII of 1975). Done After completion of reinforcement period the force was admitted to the seniority list maintained by the appellants and accordingly the respondent in the list F was added to the prosecution branch of the police department as a prosecution inspector. And was endorsed in such a manner as to exclude the limited scope of appellant's certification. The Prosecution Branch further publicized, at its request, arranged to transfer itself to the regular branch of the police which would otherwise violate the rules relating to the exchange, certifying the respondent as a regular branch inspector However, his name was not entered in List F while the appellant was formally enrolled as a Deputy Superintendent of Police on the basis of the list of individuals and acting on the charge of the respondents, the respondents stated that the appellate service of the tribunal. Promoting Appellant in front who accepts acceptance when respondents respond If he was included in the regular branch of the police, then the ban should be added that such involvement of the respondents has no effect on the seniority of the pre-serving public servants. And the terms / conditions were never challenged by the respondents in any forum.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Zhob lawyer