Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus FARZAND BEGUM

Section 6, the Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), sections 7 (v) (d) and (vi) (e), opposing suit against the jurisdiction of pre-discrimination claims, stated that the suit was a substantial part of the landed property. Was not and was. Land revenue has not been separately estimated, the trial court's jurisdiction is prohibited on section 7 (v) (d) of the Court Fees Act, 1870, and in this dispute the value of the jurisdiction according to the market value of the land Should have been determined in which the house was built. There was no part of the provisions of section 7 (v) (d) of the Judicial Fees Act 1870 in this case and was not applicable in the case as the plaintiff / pre-emperor did not file a case. For possession of a home built on suit land, the value of the jurisdiction shall not be determined on the basis of the value of the property market, but will be determined on the suit land provided under section 7 (vi) (e) of the Court Fees Act. Will be based on the revenue generated. , In the confrontation of 1870, the retailer of suit instability was repulsed best law firms from Kotla Pathan lawyer