Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAMIL versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE

Section 18, 18A & 18B of the Jammu and Kashmir Protection of Equity Property Act, 1950, Section 5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Rehabilitation Ordinance, 1952, Section 5 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1957. (VII of 1974), the appeal to the Supreme Court of the land in dispute cancellation of sections 42 and 44 vacant properties, which had been in the possession of the defendant's father since 1958, was allotted in 1962 in favor of the defendant. Appears for the acquisition of property rights in respect of this land and the appellant formally recommended the case Who claimed that the land in the dispute was allotted in favor of his father in 1951, an application was filed under Section 18B, Pakistan (Administration of Homeland Property) Act 1957, in favor of which the allotment was canceled. Was done Associan Property Respondent Custodian's father accepted the plea and dismissed Defendant's father's allotment, but the High Court vacated the Custodian's Will Identity Appellant claiming that the land in dispute was allotted in favor of his father in 1951. But before the implementation of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Rehabilitation Act, 1952, there was no provision in any law for allotment of vacancies and it was stated that all the allotments were in fact leased and leased by law. Allotment was called, in these circumstances, it was rightly found that in 1951, in favor of the appellant's father. The given allotment does not have any law and is not specifically for the allotment. Response to land dispute in the dispute was only valid for one year best advocate from Khuzdar lawyer