Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus LIAQAT HUSSAIN

In the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1994 Section 5 and Schedule II, a case was filed before the Family Judge for the restoration of marital rights, in which the appellant's female suit was dismissed and the trial court ruled in favor of the defendant. Emphasis was placed on women's statements, while women have periodically changed their version where one woman had two contenders and at one time supported one contender and at another supported the other, The dispute was with whom was she married to an Islamic? The rest of the evidence on the record can be resolved by law, and the woman's presence was not established at the place where the defendant performed the marriage, and her identity was not proved by the evidence. That the woman's father was not even present. In a house where the accused allegedly performed the marriage, even with the law failing to establish the consent of the woman and the execution of the marriage, the appellant presented the woman's father and the maid to the woman. In person, the appellant had furnished a certified copy of the statement of the woman listed in favor of the appellant and also a certified copy of the written reply of the women listed. The trial court in which she accepted the appellant as her husband was considered by the respondents to be a fake document under the circumstances. best advocate from Kotla lawyer