Article 13 Legal evidence (Article 10 of 1984), Article 74 Students publication, the performance of the occasion in which a person did not have to send the original notice to the student, the effect of the plaintiff's effect was that the notice of the students The copy consisted of the original signatures and thumb. The impression of the executed and backward witnesses and the same can be considered as genuine as the trial court ruled that the suit was dismissed, but the appellate court rejected the fact that the original notice of the accused was not forwarded to the seller. The victim was required to send a notice to the student Eshad two weeks after the date or knowledge of the sale, which can be confirmed by two true witnesses beforehand as to their right to self-determination. Certifies the intention to exercise the right, as defined in section 13 (3) of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Empathy Act, 1987 and And the copy could not be sent to the vendor Modi, who had none. T did not send the notice to the seller but chose to send a copy, which may not be the original proof of the document, but it was a secondary proof. A notice of the student E-Assad was against the provisions of Section 13 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Emission Act 1987 and in addition to this, each seller was required to submit notice of the student publication separately. The applicant did not mention the date of sending the notice of evidence and failed to comply with the provisions of section 13 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Emission Act 1987, the plaintiff was not properly appellate court in the circumstances. Discharged
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
