Preparation of additional evidence in the Appellate Court jurisdiction suit for the declaration of section 42 of the O. XLI, R 27, O VII, R 14, O XIII, RR 1 & 2 and O XVI, R 1 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877). Was partial. The decision against which the appeal was moved was moved by the plaintiffs for the preparation of additional evidence which was accepted by the appellate court and the plaintiffs submitted the entire evidence and prepare additional evidence before the trial court. There were no steps to move the request for. The plaintiff was obliged to produce the documents in his or her possession at the time of submission and intended to furnish a list of documents that were intended to be produced by the plaintiff in his possession. Did not link anyone to the claimant. Neither was he mentioned in the document presented as additional evidence in the list of witnesses filed before the trial court in which the decree was under him. The court did not have the authority to receive the documents at a later stage of the proceedings, which was in the possession or authority of a party, but was not presented at the first hearing of the trial or the list of dependent documents which were authorized by such party. Were not or have no power to do so unless good reason was shown at the relevant time for the court to record the reasons for receiving such documents at the request stage. To whom they wanted to present evidence or to present the documents at a specific time There were already alerts. Defendants and defendants weaken their case
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
