Find a Lawyer

SHABNAM versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA

Civil service advertisement for the title of Article 199 Succession Act (Sec 15 and Exxon X 1925), Sections 15 and 16 Constitution Petition C Section T (BPS 12), being a resident of this place, entitles him to the appointment. Was. Her husband was referred to the place where the spouse was living. The respondents were rightly appointed by the applicant leaving no room for the applicant and the applicant had to attack the same constitutional page. There was no locus standi circumstance, the emission was rejected

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015

• ZAHEER ULLAH v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1048
• SAMIULLAH v. AQAL MAND 2015 YLR 1059
• ABDUL LATIF v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1083
• MUHAMMAD SAID v. State 2015 PCrLJ 1108
• FAZAL FAQIR v. SAID HAROON KHAN 2015 MLD 1122
• ARSHID v. SHAMAN-UD-DIN 2015 PCrLJ 1123
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE 2015 YLR 1128
• CHANZEB v. Mst. YASMEEN BIBI 2015 MLD 1140

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2015 →

ask a advocate free from Saidu Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes