MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 bail, dismissed by the Sessions Judge for the reasons included in the bail. Yes, they were also supported by the prosecution version, especially in the version given in the FIR Sessions Judge's order to extend and guarantee the bail of the accused was neither arbitrary nor perverse. The order cannot be interrupted because he could not do so when the bail was granted by the competent court. Easily called back as usual, in the absence of concrete reasons that were obtained through misrepresentation / suppression of facts or misuse of the guarantee exception / to obstruct a fair investigation. Was used, nothing requested for cancellation of bail, conditions were rejected
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer
