Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID versus THE STATE

Arts 3 and 4 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), and: Valuation of 103 Evidence Receipt All witnesses to the prosecution were police officers and public figures. Despite his availability and presence, he was not called to testify for recovery, in the circumstances, the mandatory provisions of Section 103, CRPC were violated, alleging that the allegations were violated The Navigation Officer was on extraordinary terms with him and his family and intended to do so. The accused, falsely involved in this case, was fully established by the Investigation Officer's investigation; the investigating officer himself was a complainant, while legally he could not accept such double duty and was responsible for it. It was assumed that he would hand over the matter to the investigating officer, and another ineligible policeman made a mockery of the case by the officer himself, because if such procedure / procedure was allowed to continue. So, according to the police will provide the license to include innocent people in false / fake cases. According to his wishes, the accused was subjected to brutal torture by the complainant who was also the investigating officer in this case and was in fact a bee. n Established by the statement of a doctor who was examined as a court witness. While accepting the appeal, the court sentenced the accused and sentenced him. pakistani advocates Madinah lawyer