RAFIULLAH versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
The Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Section 561A & 169 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 based on the evidence of the defendant discharged the accused, not only in any column of challan The accused's name was not mentioned, but he was relieved of his position under 599, despite the CRPC acquiring evidence of the incident and the circumstances, despite the ocular evidence against the accused, legal proceedings or prosecution. The officer was not able to conduct a thorough investigation of the case or the defense request made by the accused and the evidence was not supported in his support. In order to exclude the accused from the challan presented to the court, the Inquiry Officer who was able to work was to place the accused in column 2 of the full challan, if he was satisfied with the statement in support of the accused's alibi. The request to grant bail was granted. Section HA directs the police to re-submit the full challan in case of the accused in column 2.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Kurram lawyer
