MUHAMMAD MUREED versus FAZAL ABBAS
Sections 75 and 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Code 337/341/342/447/148/149 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Cancellation of Section 20 The trial court issued not only the non-bailable warrants against the accused, but did not invoke the Investigation Agency without giving any reason for issuing their warrants, nor did they name them in column 2 of the charge sheet. Gone, without giving any reason for the non-bailable release, the arrest warrant against the accused was bad in law and it was also obligated to stop the accused from stopping them. UST was allowed, under conditions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Dir lawyer
