Find a Lawyer

BAHAR versus STATE

Section 302/148/149 Definition of Evidence The evidence for the controversial ocular witnesses found various contradictions and contradictions that were closely related to each other, and their evidence was admissible by any other independent evidence that they were admitted. That many people were attracted to. The material omissions and contradictions in the evidence of the alleged ocular witnesses at the scene cannot be overlooked in such a way, that the prosecutor did not succeed in establishing a strong and appropriate motive for the commission of the crime for the accused. Were associated. The evidence was unable to be relied upon, the motive, even if it was strong, would not be enough to improve the prosecution's case that both advisers for the recovery of criminal weapons at the hands of the accused were related to the first informant. It is unlikely that these two advisers should have reached the police station at the scene of the incident, thirteen days after the arrest and allegedly recovered nine days after their arrest that it was unnatural And it was impossible that the accused knew that they were involved in the murder prosecution. After stopping their case against any independent evidence-backed, interesting and inadequate witnesses, it was alleged that they could not, without reasonable doubt, be guilty of the accused. online advocate from Tarbela lawyer