Find a Lawyer

SARVANAND versus LACHMAN DAS

Representative Section 52 of the People's Act 1976 and Schedule, Form 16A and 16B Election Petitioner claimed that there were severe irregularities in the counting of votes and that he got more votes than retired candidate, and so on His choice was also justified. The returning candidate, who was declared a returning candidate, indicated that no irregularities were made in the counting of votes but errors were made while preparing and posting Form 16B. In order to rectify such errors in Section 16, an Election Tribunal had re-assigned the Provincial Election Commissioner, who himself sought restoration of the final computation of the count by Form 16B. It was made clear that the Returning Officer pursuant to which entries was in accordance with Form 16, prepared by the Assistant. Yes, there was no dispute, the applicant received more votes than the return. No candidate error was shown in the calculation of provincial election commissioner. Election Tribunal reached the provincial election commissioner to confirm the facts Form A was checked, thus, there is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the data provided by the Provincial Election Commissioner. After receiving more votes from the defendant, he was chosen as the successful and successful candidate for the respondent who was previously selected. registration advocate from Bannu lawyer