Find a Lawyer

SHAUKAT ALI versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI

Apprenticeship Ordinance 1962 Section 2 (a) (c) Apprenticeship Rules, 1966, October 18, 22 and 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Apprentice Petitioner was terminated as a Trade Apprentice. Employee was terminated after his services were terminated. As a candidate completing 3 years of training, he challenged his termination of his job as an apprentice because he had served as a helper in various departments for over three years, so he served as a steward. Had it not been, under the circumstances it could not be dismissed as the apprentice petitioner himself admitted. Upon checking that it had contracted an apprenticeship to learn welding with the respondent company, whose contract was registered with the Manpower Board of Directors, the Sindh petitioner also admitted that during the period of apprenticeship. In the meantime, he was paid a hard salary and had no other expenses and he was an applicant. The Respondent was not a member of the Company's Reiki Collective Bargaining Agent The Special Company had proved that the applicant was, at his father's request, included as a commercial apprentice for three years and the applicant, the defendant. The applicant joined as a business apprentice after an apprenticeship agreement was signed between the company and the director, Main Power Power, the labor division. After 3 years and three years of employment, his services were terminated as Apprentice Response Company. In the circumstances, Apprentice Services as Applicants were suspended. immigration advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer