STATE versus GHULAM MUJTABA
Pressure of Terrorist Activities (Special Court) Act 1975, Section 3 (l) (b), 5A & 6 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Sections 374 and 31 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), 5 302 Assassination Reference Under the Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, the competence of the High Court to set up a special court primarily to prevent acts of sabotage, insurgency and terrorism and to further such proceedings. Provided for a speedy hearing of the crimes committed or aggravated. This was not required to be confirmed by the special court by the High Court as it was frustrated rather than pursue the purpose of suppressing the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, to deal with scheduled crime cases. Will Section 747474, which was to be executed in the CRPC, would be regarded as unnecessary and excessive to the object of special law, otherwise, the Code of Conduct under the Criminal Court, 1898 5 Reference 374 would cite murder for certiorari in the High Court under CR because it was a criminal court under the High Court, but the Special Court was constituted under the Law of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts), which This was not done because of. Under the High Court, no reference was made to the High Court reference under Section 747474, in which case the CR PC would not be competent to appear before the High Court if the death sentence was pronounced by a special court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Head Marala lawyer