STATE THROUGH ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE-GENERAL, BALOCHISTAN versus SHAH BAKHSH
After apprehending section 302 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), 417, relying primarily on ocular testimony against the trial, the appellant after recording the statements of eyewitnesses, dismissed the eyewitness's previous statements. Was immediately dismissed. The medical evidence of the Ballistic Expert was also not readily available and the trial court's discretion could have been examined by the trial court in acquiring the accused under Section 265, CRPC, at the trial stage against the Ballistic Expert. The trial of the witnesses, which was not yet legal, had not been summarized by the trial court, so that their testimony would be of no avail. After completing the evidence of the remaining witnesses and remanding the order pursuant to L, the trial court obtained the remand after keeping all the evidence on record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
