Find a Lawyer

versus

Prohibited (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Arts 3, 4, 27 and 16 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 510 evidence was defined by an expert who was not a Chemical Examiner of the Government Trial Court. Without the chemical expert's scrutiny the report relied on which the analyst's empirical report, without the trial court's reliance on it, is not exempt under expert inspection section under1010, CCP had no legal effect and It was not a public document, it cannot be legally. The parcel presented in the evidence was sent after a period of about two months for allegedly exporting drug paraphernalia and no explanation was given by the investigating officer nor any evidence from the prosecution. Who was in charge of such drugs? The incident where the suspected drug was recovered from the police was the subject of the accused's house under Article 4. The Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979, which was not performed in a public place, was not an acceptable offense under Article 16 (i) (b) of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979, which was raided by the police in 1979. ? The suspect's home was located in a residential area, but no respected member of the eligible area was testified in the case when such person could be readily available. The trial court found the relevant facts and the basis of the law involved in the case. I did not take The conviction of the accused without any charge against him was proved by the trial court, thus the trial court's order was not kept aside and the accused was acquitted. how to become a advocate from Head Marala lawyer