Find a Lawyer

SHAHEEN RUHI BUKHARI. versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, QUETTA

Article 9 (1) of the Printing Press and Publications Ordinance 1995, Registration of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Locus Pentatacy, the principle of being banned for daily newspaper certification claims that it has published the daily publication Had started. The failure to produce a single copy of such a post does not constitute a record, thus, without any investigation, which cannot be safely concluded, this fact is further substantiated by this case. The time spent by the civil court during the questioning. Interim order prohibiting the applicant from publishing the newspaper ~ The applicant also failed to supply the contents of the newspaper's serial number with the names of the publishers and printers, which in fact fulfilled the applicant's position In fact, daily newspaper validation was implemented. The right can be obtained only if the order was passed in the rule of law, the pursuit of jurisdiction was done and nothing was presented to prove that, in this way, the daily al-Mushrik was brought to public notice. The creation of the favor in favor of the applicant was canceled when it came to the notice that another journal was already being published in the same language and in the same name in the name of ash east of, therefore, any exception, the district magistrate. Cannot be displayed on display orders online advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer