Find a Lawyer

AURANGZEB SHAFFI BURKI versus FAROOQ AHMAD

Arbitration Act 1940 Section 316 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Constitution of Sections 30 and 33 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of Section 30 and 33, Arbitration Act, 1940 relating to the court filed by the respondents under dispute. The filing of the objections passed during the proceedings of the salem for the company's shares between the parties relating to the terms and conditions of sale of the shares, the trial court on summary proceedings, before the trial court, The action was postponed, the High Court affirmed the order of the trial. Regarding the legal status of the court, the petitioner requested that Section 316, Companies Ordinance 1984 by the High Court, that the proceedings before the trial court be properly adjourned and that the amendment proceedings before the High Court did not lie. Yes, it was misunderstood because it could neither be prosecuted nor reviewed beforehand. The High Court relates to the liquidation of the company so that it can draw the terms of section 316, Companies Ordinance, 1984, before the trial court's dispute over the certification of the award, which was between two private individuals, although it was involved in the sale of the company's shares. Therefore, the matter cannot be considered legal against him or the company by which the matter has been raised. The applicant was required to take the leave of appeal on the examination which was discussed lawer from fb area from Balakot lawyer