Find a Lawyer

GULZAR AHMED versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN COAST GUARDS

Ports Act 1908 Section 2 and Schedule Ports Act (XV of 1908), Section 3 (4) Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 2 (J) and 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the applicants. Conservation of goods by the Coast Guard Petitioners Karachi Cantonment Railway Station maintains that the Karachi Cantonment Railway Station from which such goods were seized was not part of the coastal area; the High Court did not agree that such seizures and The petitioner was given a show cause notice in connection with the matter. Prior to adjusting authority under the Customs Act, 1969, the definition of the accuracy of coastal areas included areas that would not otherwise have been interpreted as part of the Coastal Area which Means that authorized legislation can provide definitions of a term other than its ordinary dictionary, which means first. The schedule of the Pakistan Coast Guards Act 1973 would exclude any port boundaries in the coastal area if the customs ports specified in the port were located within the boundaries of any port. Neither the Act, 1908 nor any other appropriate legislature could indicate that the cantonment railway station in Karachi was part of a port for the pursuit of justice, excluding it from the coastal area, as in the earlier schedule of the Pakistan Coast Guards Act. It is stated, in 1973, the leave to appeal was denied in circumstances [words and phrases] top advocates from Sangote lawyer