Find a Lawyer

KHURSHID ALAM versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Law Reform Ordinance 1972 Section 3 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Sections 5 and 14 Intra-Court Appeals Time-barred Intra-Court Appeal The time spent in the application for review of the petition filed by the Judge's order excludes Appeal for condolences at the time The appellant's constitutional petition was only decided on 17 10 1996 at the time the case was filed for review of the Single Judge's order. A copy of the decision was provided to him on 11 11 1996. And the same day he filed for review, the application for review of the decision was rejected on 17 was 1997, the appeal was filed on 19 3 1997, which was delayed and the petitioner filed for delay. The time I spent could not be wasted while the ban was to be followed. Delay in filing the appeal was rejected and timely appeal dismissed property advocates from Hayatabad lawyer