SHAMAS RIZWAN versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
CHAPTER 6, R6 6 (ii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition alleges the retrieval of objectionable material from the applicant while he was appearing in English paper \ A \ The applicant was charged. And personally appeared before the Disciplinary Committee for its self-defense discipline. The order passed in the appeal against the appeal committee's decision, however, the applicants for the two exams approved the review against the appeals committee without the permission of the chairman of the board of controllers. Appeals can be filed in the examinations, no appeal was filed against the decision of the Disciplinary Committee and, in fact, the report of the office was validated under which the applicant was allowed to approve the decision of the Disciplinary Committee. Permission was sought for this, no appeal was made in writing before the Appeal Committee which also showed that No such appeal was filed by the Review Committee, as well as the orders of the Appeal Committee's Controller Examinations, and the order of the disciplinary committee was reinstated and the authority was directed to conclude the applicant's results simultaneously. Announce, so that if required, he can appear in the next test under the rules
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
