Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMID versus ABDUL KARIM

Section 65, 2 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Applicant has the right to claim vacant property after the removal of the eviction law. ? In question, nor did he submit a form of CH for the transfer of the house, nor was any part of it transferred to the claimant of the House respondent in 1960 and thereafter a permanent transfer agreement. I was released in favor of the respondent in the Department Settlement, after that, the Facts became opioid and the property. The respondent went out of the compensation pool, thereby making the application for notification of the applicant's notification to the applicant's notification officer who made a permanent transfer case at home and removed the application for late condolences in late 1980 (removal of eviction rules. Was absolutely ineligible and ineligible, as before, neither the settlement authorities had any pending issues nor any part of the property was applicable to the transfer of the constitutional application, however, the applicant's conduct Was able to be excluded because of The petitioner himself admitted that he had never applied for the transfer of the house, nor had any CH form petitioner claimed the sale agreement in his favor after which he had filed. The applicant, who made the first declaration against the applicant and then the contract for sale-specific performance, hereby acknowledges the transfer of the property to the defendant, otherwise, he is not willing to purchase the property. And cannot insist on the execution of a sale agreement. Such matters best advocate from Shedani sharif lawyer