ABDUL QADEER QAMAR versus THE STATE
The magistrate terminating sections 298A and 295C criminal code codes (V1898), sections 90 (3), 347 and 561 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC), under 5 298A, PPC. The accused were tried, but before the judgment was rendered, the sessions court considered the accused, 5 fac 295 C, under section 190 (3) and 347, upon receipt of the person convicted under PPC, c. The case was sent to the Sessions Court, satisfied with the initial face of Sessions Court 5. 295 C, PPC continued with this case, considering the complaint of justification at the time of the formation of charge by the court in which the persons mentioned in Section 298A, PPC were not mentioned but present in the presence of There is a charge regarding the use of derogatory remarks in connection. Mohammed (p) the Magistrate, therefore, had no choice but to send the Sessions Court for trial, keeping in view the procedural law, which the Sessions Court had expressed in regard to the first focus of Section 295C, p. The PCs were also liable under the lid accused, Section 295C, PPC, which was heard by the court session.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Karachi lawyer