GENERAL MANAGER/S.A.A. PAKISTAN ORDNANCE FACTORY, WAH CANTT versus ASHIQ HUSSAIN
Articles 1 (3) (a) and 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, LIII of Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act, 1952, Section 3 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 12 (3) The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Application Section 1 (3) (a), explicitly excludes the provisions of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, where the ordinance factory worker was dismissed from employment. Went, he was. S: 25A is not entitled to file a complaint in the terms of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, even if the complaint application can be transferred under the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, its Despite the protection of the employment of any organization in the Pakistan Essential Services (Rehabilitation) Act, 1952, the complaint of its employee has to be moved to a court established under the Industrial Relations Arden. Anise, 1969, which was not specifically applicable to employees of the ordinance factories labor courts established under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, thus, had no jurisdiction to decide on the complaints of the employees of the ordinance factories labor court and the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Will not be the one who mistakenly took over the jurisdiction. Ordinance Factory Employee's job is to determine the wiring for dismissal of the defendant, however, they were advised to transfer the application / representation to the appropriate authority and to put their authority before the authority. Feeling that he had not had the opportunity to hear a re-hearing order, the circumstances were put aside in the service of the employees.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
