Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE


The Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Article 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the suspension, the High Court refused to admit the accused and suspended his bail. The accused did not participate in the incident as no effective role was assigned on the basis of the evidence available on the record. The accused's appeal is still pending in the High Court, the parties do not have a deep appreciation of the evidence. Was done It is possible that the leave of appeal was denied at such a stage of the case, however, the accused's appeal should be heard and the decision made by the same.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Umer Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.