Find a Lawyer

RAFT ULLAH KHAN versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, LAHORE

Article (()) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Rule of Audi ultimum Partum was issued in 1968 for notification of the suspension of petitions of the West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance, 1965. Such notification is another notification. Source was withdrawn. In 1991, the effect was that the provisions of the ordinance were mobilized against the respondents by challenging the respondent's Establishment, whereby the notification had already been revoked and the notification was revoked that the respondents' pre-hearing. The withdrawal of a suspension order without a violation of the provisions of the Audi UltraPremium. There is no legal requirement to be valid because the provincial government, before issuing a notification for the application of the ordinance under Article 1 (3) of the Ordinance, gives the show cause notice to the establishment of suspended orders pending the process of ordinance. ? 1968, having no reference to any of the provisions of the Ordinance and such orders were approved by the Administration on suspension orders, it did not create nor avail of the defendants of the nature of whose application. According to the Audi-Ultram Partem Order, the High Court was reversed while the High Court (withdrawal of the 1968 suspension order) was not guaranteed and the subsequent notification was retained. ? attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chak Sheza lawyer