MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus STATE
Article 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) argued that eyewitnesses were witnesses of the occasion who had no valid reason for their presence in the field at the time of their presence. According to the FIR, the suspect fired a rifle, but medical evidence indicated that the fire was carried out with a 12-bore gun, and that the complainant and the investigating officer tried to rectify the case unknowingly. Was allowed to appeal, among other things, consider the evidence raised by the accused and to reproduce the evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Hunza Nagar lawyer
