Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus ABDUL AZIZ

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Maxim: The name of the government employees who were dismissed from the Audi ultimum partium was included in the list of government employees who had to be removed from their jobs without a hearing. Has already made up his mind to dismiss the employment of public servants, such a request was not accepted by the public servants by the public servants, therefore, they were not condemned to be heard. Which contradicts the spirit of natural justice contained in the Maxim Audi Ultram Podium. The dismissal order was such that the High Court's position was baseless, extraordinary and without jurisdiction that the government employee was dismissed from the job with a default mind and also a command issued by the relevant authority. Without providing the opportunity for a hearing. The special tribunal for dismissing the government employees, citing the yen, said that the mockery of the list was dismissed without giving them a fair chance to be heard, therefore, the decision of the High Court on any basis on the law. I was not sustainable under which a civil servant's dismissal order was upheld by Malala, quorum justice and without any jurisdiction, the Supreme Court petition. There was also a 32-day ban on leave for appeal, for which no satisfactory explanation for the delay was granted, but the appeal was denied and the ban was granted. Was banned. how to become a advocate from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer