DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN versus MASOOD BAIG
Section 38 (3) Railway Servants (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1961, R4 Terminating the Services of Employees The Labor Court instructed the employees to conduct regular inquiries against the employee for misconduct to the Railway Authorities (Appellant). Given the option. According to the law, such an employee was found to be subject to misconduct. Such a decision would be subject to scrutiny before the Labor Court, and thereafter, the Labor Appellate Tribunal would be subject to such an order before the court or against it. Should not be allowed to affect. The final decision will be announced by the Labor Court, but at the present stage, it cannot be said whether the new inquiry against the employee was rejected or whether the justification of the new order will be examined independently when such a case is in court. will come.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
