UNITED BANK LIMITED versus MUHAMMAD RATTAS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 51 Complaint Notice Limitation Employee whose services were terminated in 1991, was enforced after 15 years from 1994 to 1993. After serving the necessary basic training he was serving the job. It was posted at this place. The benefits of a three-year intervention, which was denied to the employee's claim, were sent to the employer on 25 May 1995 by a notice of legal complaint. The employer claimed that the employee's claim was withheld over time because of the notice of complaint sent by the employees after the expiry of the legal time. Employees will not be able to refrain from claiming arrears simply because of the time taken by the employees to be permanent. The employer contends that the employee was overruled due to his back benefits claim, which was reversed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Chaininda lawyer
