BIBI GUL versus KHOR BIBI
The withdrawal of the Civil Procedure Code Order XXIII of the CPC and the adjustment of the suit O XXIII, R 1, OI, R, 10 and section 115 were earlier withdrawn without the permission of the Court of Inheritance Claim The case was later filed for the same reason. Was filed in which some defendants were not implemented while a new defendant was enforced. No relief was claimed against the newly added defendants. The provisions of O XXIII, R 1, CPC have placed a complete ban on the same subject and the subsequent matter when it was established between the parties and their legal representatives. ? Or the plaintiff's withdrawal, without the permission of the court to file a fresh case on the same case, by or against a person pursuant to the same title. Except for the defendants in the first case, as well as the new defendants without demanding relief, the party will not be able to hold a second trial on the same subject, nor, by such a case, A XXIII, R 1 (3). ) Can arrange redundant or defeated initial case back on the same subject without seeking permission to file a fresh case. The suit was subsequently neither sued nor subject to the maintenance of a new party nor the subject matter of color, nature and suit of the former party when the suit relates to the same subject matter and proceedings. Based on the same reason
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mubarik Pur lawyer