OZONE INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Clause 18 (2) of the Customs Act 1969 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Duty Restriction and Payment, The applicants (Importers) claimed the accuracy when submitting the entry bill by the importers. That no regulatory duty was recovered during this period. The High Court's Customs Duty Division Bench had another form, for Regulatory Duty, the High Court's Customs Duty Division Bench had another appearance while CLC 106 of 1997 had already rejected the argument that its customs duty This argument was rejected because it was exempt from. Under section 18 (1) and 18 (2), both were imposed under the Customs Act 1969, not convincing, as it was subject to such exemptions, limitations, restrictions and regulations. Further consideration based on any other new material or legal proposal, which was either not considered at the time of settlement, the matter was reported as CLC 106 in 1997, or on the Division Bench's first decision. Applicants to review were the circumstances changed depending on a new provision of the law or the desire for a larger bench to consider such a question was not guaranteed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Gharo lawyer