The approval of the charge of proof against the Section 13D accused of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, its statement was filed under Section 342, CRPC, and it did not show that it ever produced any of Kalashnikov's licenses. Was allegedly found to have been recovered and the allegedly recovered arms was recovered, which not only had the accused behaved unfairly but was not held responsible under Section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, the 1965 recovery adviser was also a stock witness. Yes, the accused was also acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
