Find a Lawyer

KHALID MAHMOOD versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 and 22 Bail, Heroin recovery grant did not affect any public place, Was imposed from the inside. After the raid on his house, the accused, thus, falls under Article 4 of the Prohibited (Enforcement Hadith) Order, 1979 and not under Article 3 of any order provided under Article 16 of any order. In such cases, it was mandatory for the arresting officer / inspector to seek the accused and obtain warrant under Article 22 Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979, but such mandatory supply of law The accused was not complied with, having been in custody for more than a year, but it was alleged that the defendant was sued due to any act or omission. I was at the end of May, conditions, allegedly recovered from the huge amounts of heroin, regardless, will be eligible for bail. F the suspect, further investigation into the case was needed. On reasonable grounds was there to believe that the accused was not guilty of the death sentence, life imprisonment or ten years imprisonment, so he was released on bail. pakistani advocates Sargodha lawyer