NIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE
Based on the evidence of the Criminal Investigation Officer (CRPC) Section 497 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 212/121 A & 122 of the Anti-National Activities Act (VII of 1974), Section 13 bail, the entire prosecution case. Was. Only one of the complainants in this case and the complainant / investigating officer, besides two witnesses, was the advisor to the arrest of the accused report filed by the investigating officer more than five years after the alleged incident. Was not based on the facts, but in fact this was recorded at the behest of the superintendent of police and a member of the law enforcement agencies was not presented as a witness if the accused had a criminal connection in this case. Mills in the absence of reasonable grounds to believe that there was no authoritative material to do Non-bailable offense was committed, the case was submitted for approval guaranteed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Haveli Lakha lawyer
