Find a Lawyer

KARIMJI EBRAHIMJI & SONS versus TAJ COMPANY LTD.

Default in payment of rent, against tenant company (company) against tenant company (company) in payment of rent expense, Centennial Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 and Ordinance of 21 companies (XLVII of 1984), Section 290 And was summoned in 316. The matters of such company were pending in the Lahore High Court and they said that the High Court had appointed the Board of Administrators instead of the Board of Directors of the company, apart from any lawsuit or any legal proceedings against the company. Except for the leave of this High Court Company. Such a request was accepted by the controller of rent and the eviction proceedings stopped and the landlord was required to take legal leave of the relevant High Court of Section 316, Companies Ordinance 1984, unless appointed as temporary manager. , No trial or any other case. Legal proceedings should be proceeded with or without judicial leave without the appointment of an administrator by the High Court, the appointment of a temporary manager under section 1616 Companies, the Ordinance of the Companies, 1984 1984 1984 Rental Control Order Was not found to have any impairment or inconvenience or the order of the Rent Controller was confirmed in the circumstances. law firms from Bisham lawyer