Find a Lawyer

AINY BUILDERS & COMPANY, HYDERABAD versus HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, HYDERABAD

The trial court's jurisdiction to pass judgment and decree of the limitation Act 1908 was not delayed by the appellate court before the delay in filing the appeal and it was jurisdictional and the decision was passed after appreciating the evidence on record. had gone. Thus, the judgment and the decree passed by the trial court cannot be dismissed, therefore, in limiting the appeal, the limitation period will apply, the defendant's appeal was admittedly withheld by 28 days. And was a defective plaintiff demonstrating the cause of the delay. Due to the time lapse by the defendants, the delay in prioritizing the appeal after the expiration of the right to receive the plaintiffs was not accounted for, not so valuable time was taken over the alleged illness period. Go. There was nothing that could have prevented defendants from treating them in a timely manner, after a delay of 28 days of the stipulated timeframe, and the appeal has been filed, they could not identify the proper and reasonable grounds. So that they could be forgiven for the delay, therefore, there was no illegal action on the record or misrepresentation of evidence. Guaranteed interference with the High Court review jurisdiction property advocate from Havelian lawyer