There was no sanction for appreciation of the evidence registered in the FIR after the initial inquiry into the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34. The eye witnesses were not natural and probable witnesses of the incident and appealed on the occasion of their presence on the important occasion. Not done Visiting the police station to file a report also suggested his absence at the scene of the incident and that he had improved the story of litigation during the FIR, but this is not the case, internally. There is no compelling evidence. This can make it credible that the defendant's conviction can neither dispel verbal evidence nor is it sufficient to prove the crime itself that the accused was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.